Conventional strain energy in heterocycles


Work type: Annotated Bibliography and research
Subject or discipline: Chemistry
Title: conventional strain energy in heterocycles
Number of sources: 6
Provide digital sources used: No
Paper format: Other: ACs style
# of pages: 6
Spacing: Double spaced
# of words: 1650
# of slides: ppt icon 0
# of charts: 0
Paper details:
I need three sources for Annotated Bibliography ,so the first three pages should be Annotated Bibliography , each page is about a summary, Objective Evaluation and Subjective evaluation for one source. the rest three pages are about research paper contains 6 sources. these are Objective Evaluation : Timeliness: The timeliness of the information.

•When was the information published or posted?
•Has the information been revised or updated?
•Is the information current or too out-of-date for my topic?
•Are all the links functional or are there dead links?*

Relevance: The importance of the information for your needs.
•Does the information relate to my topic or answer my question?
•Who is the intended audience?
•Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too simple or advanced) for my needs?
•Did I look at a variety of sources before deciding to use this one?
•Would I be comfortable using this source for my college research paper?

Authority: The source of the information.
•Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
•Are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations given?
•What are the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations?
•What are the author’s qualifications to write on the topic?
•Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
•Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? Examples: .com .edu .gov .org .net*

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the information. •Where does the information come from?
•Is the information supported by evidence?
•Has the information been reviewed by anyone else?
•Can I verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
•Does the language or tone seem biased? Or is it free of emotion?
•Are there spelling, grammar, typographical, or other errors?

Purpose: The reason the information exists.
•What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade?
•Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear?
•Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda?
•Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
•Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
don’t feel as if you need to address each criteria as a checklist. Use the criteria that are appropriate for your source. When relevant, address such things as bias or lack of bias, outdated material or current material, and author’s point of view.
Subjective evaluation: Include a summary of the relevance of the source to your research topic or question. How will the source contribute to your research, and how useful will it be? Does it offer a unique perspective? Does it offer a contradictory viewpoint to another source?

Finally use simple words and american spelling

I upload 4 souces now and after a hour i will upload extra, use the first three sources for Annotated Bibliography and all six sources for the research paper

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: