ORDER NOW your custom paper to have it completed successfully on time.
Email Us: email@example.com
Isaac has worked as a staff nurse on the telemetry floor for over 15 years. He holds seniority in the unit. His patient care is satisfactory; however, his interpersonal behaviors are becoming an increasing issue for his coworkers. He throws papers around the unit, gives short answers to questions, and seems generally miserable. He tells the staff that they are lazy and stupid. He is constantly questioning their decisions. You have come from another local hospital in the role of the assistant nurse manager. Based on your observations, you have met with Isaac informally and discussed his behaviors, but they have not changed. Now three new nurses have already come to you saying that this unit is a great match for them, except for one problem. Although they have not identified Isaac by name, they have told you that one of the nurses is extremely abusive verbally, and they have been calling in sick on the days they are scheduled to work with this person.
- What are your responsibilities as an assistant nurse manager in regard to Isaac’s behavior problem?
- What is the next step in dealing with Isaac’s behaviors?
- How will you, as the manager, have Isaac develop more effective people skills?
This is your first position as a nurse manager. The holidays are rapidly approaching, and the hospital policy states that each unit will negotiate holiday coverage individually. You are already getting requests via e-mail and on Post-it notes for holiday time. Several staff members have come to you stating that they “never” seem to get their requests for holidays. Discussion among the staff members is creating dissension and conflict.
- Discuss the potential impact of this problem on you and the unit staff.
- Describe a minimum of one positive consequence and one negative consequence of this conflict.
- Select a model of conflict resolution and explain how you, as a nurse manager, might resolve this conflict.
ORDER NOW your custom paper to have it completed successfully on time.
Email Us: firstname.lastname@example.org
Need help-ENGLIT 0300
Part of this writing-intensive course involves substantially revising work you’ve already written. By this point in the semester, you’ve composed three short papers based on online posts—one of which you’ll expand and revise for your final assignment by including the work of another author from our syllabus in your analysis. Here are your objectives for the essay:
- Choose an essay whose argument can accommodate an additional literary text and be taken to greater lengths without breaking
- Find an author’s work that fits comfortably alongside the original text you analyzed and helps to further illuminate your essay’s thesis
- Rework your original essay’s structure and argument to make room for this additional author’s work (you can’t simply leave the original version intact and attach new pages to the end of it)
- Create a balanced analysis of both authors’ work, making sure to talk about and quote from them to an equal extent in your essay’s body
- Cite at least two relevant secondary sources whose ideas about your primary texts and authors will give credence to your own
- Make revisions to the original essay at both a local level (spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc.) and most importantly global level (sentence/paragraph structure, thesis clarity, textual evidence, flow, etc.), while applying those improved notions to your writing about the newly-added text
CHOOSING AN ESSAY AND ADDING ANOTHER AUTHOR
Let’s say that for your first essay, you wrote about Perks of Being a Wallflower, focusing on the role played by substances like alcohol and drugs in the lives of Charlie and his friends. When writing that essay, you highlighted specific moments when these substances were relied upon the most by certain characters, but you didn’t consider the larger meaning of using one substance versus another (drinking beer versus wine, or smoking pot versus dropping acid). By addressing that angle of your argument, and including other good substance-abuse examples in the narrative as added ammunition, this essay could easily and sensibly be expanded. While reading Eighty Days of Sunlight, you noticed how Jason is also shaped by his experiences with alcohol and soft drugs, with his brother Tommy succumbing to harder drugs. Your original argument about Perks, then, finds a home in Eighty as well. You would find revealing passages in Eighty that clearly compare to the ones you’ve already found in Perks, noting the extent to which they reflect one another.
SYNTHESIZING AND STRUCTURING YOUR NEW ANALYSIS
Of course, it won’t be enough to simply graft the pages on Eighty to the end of your Perks essay; instead, you have to find a way to interweave the Perks and Eighty portions so there’s not a big gap in the middle of your essay separating them. It’s important for your reader to see throughout your essay how these two authors’ texts intersect, rather than wait until the final paragraph to discover that answer. You could go back and forth between each author over the course of your paper: devoting one or two paragraphs to one author which focus one of your main ideas, then examine the same idea in the other author for one or two paragraphs, etc. Additionally, you could talk about each author separately while making sure, when discussing the second author’s work, to refer back to important and related points you raised about the first author’s work earlier in your paper. Since this is a longer essay than the others, you can spend more than one paragraph at the beginning to establish your adjusted thesis. Finally, because you’re dealing with two authors in the same essay, you need to discuss them to an equal extent; spending twice as much time on Perks as you do on Eighty creates an imbalanced paper.
In addition to including a second author’s literature as a primary text alongside your original primary text, you must incorporate at least two secondary sources into your argument which help to support it. For the purposes of this assignment, secondary sources are works of non-fiction that discuss your specific primary texts and/or authors, address your essay’s larger theme, or provide some kind of relevant context (historical, literary, etc.). These sources can be a book-length monograph (written by one person), an article from an academic journal, or a chapter from a book that’s a collection of essays written by different people; no general-reference sources like encyclopedias or dictionaries are allowed. For the hypothetical Perks/Eighty essay, a journal article or essay chapter about Perks would be useful (Eighty is probably too new to have been written about analytically); in addition, a source discussing substance abuse in teens (either real or fictional) would help to give your analysis of the books more context. Regardless of what kind of secondary sources you cite, each one must be credible and directly relevant to your thesis; tell your reader some significant information about a source (the writer’s expertise or the source’s title, for example) when you first cite it. Don’t confine all your secondary sources to the same paragraph or the very end of your essay; spread them out and cite them more than once if you can. In addition, don’t spend as much time discussing your secondary sources as you do your primary sources; the latter literary texts should be your main concern. These secondary sources, along with your primary literary sources, should be listed on a separate Works Cited page in proper MLA format at the end of your essay.
To give you a fuller perspective on your work, you will get feedback on your draft not just from me but from your colleagues as well. I will assign each of you group members with whom you’ll conduct peer reviews of your essay drafts. Here’s the timeline you will follow:
The week of November 28: we will watch the film version of The Piano Lesson
Monday December 5: by 1:00 PM that day, you will email copies of your draft to me and your group members. This draft should be the required length (10-12 pages, plus Works Cited page) so that your readers can get a full sense of how you plan to combine the two authors’ works in your analysis. All drafts are inevitably imperfect, so no one should expect a finished product from you (or you from them). Each student will have two or three drafts to read over and write responses to (I will give you a guide of things to pay attention to in the draft).
December 5 and 7: no classes will be held these days; instead, I will hold one-on-one meetings with students in my office (CL439) to go over your work in progress. I expect you to work on your peer reviews during these days too.
December 9: you will come to class to meet with your group and discuss your notes on each other’s work, exchanging ideas that help to generate deeper thinking about your chosen texts. I will come around to address further questions and give further feedback. Over the next five days, take into consideration your colleagues’ suggestions (and mine as well) as you rework your draft and enhance its qualities.
December 14: The completed version of your paper, ten to twelve pages long with a Works Cited page at the end, is due by noon; drop it in my campus mailbox in CL501 along with the original version of the essay with my comments on it, so I can see the extent to which you revised/expanded it.
Need help-Accounting Theory Questions
Positive accounting theory and agency theory make certain central assumptions about what influences people’s decisions.
What are these assumptions? (3) Discuss whether you believe these are realistic of stakeholder behaviour? (5) How does this differ from the perspective embraced within normative research? (5) Does the current conceptual framework embrace a wide group of stakeholders? (2) Do you think that this framework is more aligned to the assumptions underlying a positive view by virtue of the stakeholders identified to be relevant? Discuss. (5)
Some information of how the question should be handled?
PAT (reference to self-interest, opportunistic behaviour, focus on wealth), Normative (reference to Legitimacy Theory – acceptability of actions to a community) (reference to ‘ethical’ dimension of stakeholder theory – addressing stakeholder ‘needs’)
Difference(s) – PAT descriptive and prescriptive – looks at what is, and therefore what is expected; Normative – looks at what should be – should be in terms of societal expectation, or the intrinsic needs of stakeholders.
Discussions of assumptions
Explain to a positive theorist – discuss in the context of an appeal to the assumptions underlying PAT – that is, when CSR reporting can be demonstrated to be important to generating wealth.
Note: use of examples to exemplify discussion is important.
Economics-based theories such as Positive Accounting Theory and Agency Theory make assumptions about what motivates human actions (for example, a quest to maximise personal wealth), and such motivations are attributed to all individuals.
By contrast, normative research studies consider what ‘should be’ and this may be explored empirically (legitimacy and stakeholder studies for example). These studies may explore individuals as groups or/and individuals’ actions and choices such as motivations to report information. They typically do not make broad-based assumptions about how all individuals behave, or about what motivates them to behave in a particular way (although there could be an acceptance that many individuals will tend to adopt specific strategies or biases when making decisions).
There has been an increasing trend since the 1990’s to broaden the concept of reporting to stakeholders. Prior to this time, the focus was on financial reporting of monetary amounts, and a strong focus on meeting compliance requirements. Since that time, financial and compliance requirements have increased significantly, but so has a trend to report on environmental and social activities, and more recently corporate governance matters. This has been an interesting change in terms of the expectations of what is required to report to stakeholders. Arguments have also moved to discussion that perhaps there are alternative reporting methods to monetary amounts, that in some cases monetary amounts may not be the most appropriate approach to reporting. This has implications for accountants who have had the main responsibility for both guiding reporting and offering assurance in regard to these reports.
Discuss this change in focus, ensuring you make clear the difference between integrated, sustainability and traditional financial reports. (14) In your response, you may like to consider whether this achievable in the historical cost framework? (6)
Some Information of how the Question should be handled
- What do you understand by traditional financial reporting (historic cost/variations on ‘true’ historic cost/reporting on past events??/basis to understand the future??). Traditional financial reporting focuses on recognising the financial effects of an entity’s transactions. It follows generally accepted accounting principles and accounting standards and is audited by an external auditor. The financial report is limited to transactions that have a financial impact. Sustainability reporting however goes beyond this. It includes reporting on the environmental activities and of the entity as well as its social impacts. These are combined with financial information.
- The following benefits can be gained from preparing sustainability reports:
- Embedding sound corporate governance and ethics systems throughout the organisation
- Improved management of risk through enhanced management systems and performance monitoring
- Formalising and enhancing communication with key stakeholders
- Attracting and retaining competent staff
- Ability to benchmark performance with other entities. Explain what is meant by sustainability reporting (the 3 dimensions/forward thinking)
- Differences between the two:
- Economic financial compared to eco/soc and env
- Report on past performance /future performance
- Historic cost/intergenerational equity
- Eco efficiency/eco-justice
- Need to change the outlook of accounting – the underlying process is based on historic cost and the past??
- How does the HCA model seek to achieve this? By recording actual business events/transaction in monetary form. A contract where a good/service is exchanged for $.
- However, this is a fiction:
- The HCA model operates as a mixed method model. There are judgements made relating to what is included making the model to a greater or lesser degree subjective, not totally reliable nor necessarily faithfully representative of events without bias. 
- Choice within accounting standards (Depreciation method, stock valuation, independent revaluations, impairment, fair value)
- Professional judgement in choices made
- Value systems of the accountant
- Approach where there not an accounting standard/regulation
- Implications of the additivity problem/changing prices
Need help-Accounting Theory Questions
Gender roles among the men differ ranging from race to culture. Although the tasks assigned to men differ based on rate of maturity, there has been the overlooking of men of color in terms of gender roles. They are confronted by ethnic identity including cultural demands. They are required to reconcile male and cultural identities including the adoption of the behavior of the society in terms of ethnicity. The African-Americans have adopted attitudes and actions that emphasize physical strength and honor. The American-Indians strive to adjust to the culture and traditions of elders despite the trauma they undergo. The societal beliefs make this notion difficult especially with the inclusion of family demands and work. Men tend to undergo psychological problems when they fail to fulfill their roles according to culture. Being a man is evident from childhood to adulthood while identity follows a complex process. As a result, men of color are subjected to societal gender roles, which dominate and deny them opportunities to maintain their standards. They then become frustrated, emotional and seek survival under harsh conditions. Men of color feel segregated due to their family heritage, skin color and physical characteristics, which do not conform to dominant culture. As a result, men of color are subjected to stress and conflict as they strive to fulfill gender roles.
African-American men are associated with pride, control, and power, which enable them cope with stress and the environment. Latino men adopt machismo culture to define their roles so as to meet the demands of dominant culture. They reconcile their differences and integrate their cultural standards and those of dominant culture in order to avert stressful situations. The American-Indians are no longer able to sustain their identity due to loss of core tasks. Self-hatred and selflessness are associated with American-Indian men due to the inability to protect their community. They lost their members to the dominant culture, which made their roles suffer. They cannot integrate with local culture due to racism and discrimination, which has affected their roles as men. The Asian-Americans involve privacy when faced with uncertainties and do not consider surrender in terms of family obligations and needs. They are obligated to provide for the family despite the discomfort they face from the dominant culture. They are highly valued and are authoritative in family relations. However, they should refrain from being emotional in public because they are respectable in family settings.
Having Sex with Girls
Girls and guys handle sex matters differently due to their different approaches to virginity. As much as guys get worried when they are virgins, girls view this differently. Guys will make out with girls and have sex, but this becomes a secret because they do not discuss it with friends. However, girls will always discuss their sex experiences with other girls. When guys brag about having sex with a girl, other guys are likely to consider the girl a whore which may not be true. However, guys do not admit the number of girls they have had sex with, and they appear reserved on such topics. The pressure to have sex may come from other guys and not the girlfriend. Some guys want to wait for the right person although temptations to have sex deter them. Guys find disclosing their virginity to other guys difficult because they will be ridiculed and given a hard time. Although keeping oneself for the right person is right, some guys fear relationships and would rather make out with girls as playboy types.
Some guys can even engage in rampant sex with girls without considering the consequences such as virginity. Being a virgin is necessary for guys who want to have families some day and commit to the woman they love. Although guys struggle to keep off girls regarding sex issues, some girls initiate sex and guys admit that they found themselves in the act. It is necessary to avoid being the type of guy that preys on girls and instead considers mutual understanding and respect while embracing commitments. Sex should be preserved for marriage because intimacy with someone is something special. However, engaging in sex with multiple people demeans the pleasurable act. Being principled is important in overcoming youthful challenges and guys should reconsider their sexual acts before it is too late.